[net,1/1] net: batman-adv: Treat NET_XMIT_CN as transmit successfully
Commit Message
From: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but
it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan,
macvlan, and others treat NET_XMIT_CN as success too.
So batman-adv should add the NET_XMIT_CN check.
Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
---
net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c | 2 +-
net/batman-adv/fragmentation.c | 2 +-
net/batman-adv/routing.c | 2 +-
net/batman-adv/tp_meter.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Comments
On Montag, 21. November 2016 08:39:39 CET fgao@ikuai8.com wrote:
> From: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
>
> The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but
> it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan,
s/packe/packet/
> macvlan, and others treat NET_XMIT_CN as success too.
>
> So batman-adv should add the NET_XMIT_CN check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
> ---
> net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c | 2 +-
> net/batman-adv/fragmentation.c | 2 +-
> net/batman-adv/routing.c | 2 +-
> net/batman-adv/tp_meter.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
[...]
Not sure how the batman-adv maintainers see this - but this patch needs
an additional patch for net-next to also add it to the parts which were
rewritten.
Kind regards,
Sven
Hi Sven,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org> wrote:
> On Montag, 21. November 2016 08:39:39 CET fgao@ikuai8.com wrote:
>> From: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
>>
>> The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but
>> it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan,
>
> s/packe/packet/
What's this mean?
>
>> macvlan, and others treat NET_XMIT_CN as success too.
>>
>> So batman-adv should add the NET_XMIT_CN check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
>> ---
>> net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c | 2 +-
>> net/batman-adv/fragmentation.c | 2 +-
>> net/batman-adv/routing.c | 2 +-
>> net/batman-adv/tp_meter.c | 2 +-
>> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> [...]
>
> Not sure how the batman-adv maintainers see this - but this patch needs
> an additional patch for net-next to also add it to the parts which were
> rewritten.
>
> Kind regards,
> Sven
Ok. I would commit another patch to net-next.
Best Regards
Feng
On Montag, 21. November 2016 16:21:52 CET Feng Gao wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org> wrote:
> > On Montag, 21. November 2016 08:39:39 CET fgao@ikuai8.com wrote:
> >> From: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
> >>
> >> The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but
> >> it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan,
> >
> > s/packe/packet/
>
> What's this mean?
That there is a minor typo (*t* is missing) and this sed statement (when
applied only to the commit message) would fix it.
David already marked this patch as "Under Review" in his patchwork. So I would
guess that he will accept this patch and not the batman-adv maintainers. And
maybe he will fix this small typo - or maybe not.
Kind regards,
Sven
Hi Sven,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org> wrote:
> On Montag, 21. November 2016 16:21:52 CET Feng Gao wrote:
>> Hi Sven,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org> wrote:
>> > On Montag, 21. November 2016 08:39:39 CET fgao@ikuai8.com wrote:
>> >> From: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
>> >>
>> >> The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but
>> >> it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan,
>> >
>> > s/packe/packet/
>>
>> What's this mean?
>
> That there is a minor typo (*t* is missing) and this sed statement (when
> applied only to the commit message) would fix it.
Thanks. I didn't thought it was sed statement.
>
> David already marked this patch as "Under Review" in his patchwork. So I would
> guess that he will accept this patch and not the batman-adv maintainers. And
> maybe he will fix this small typo - or maybe not.
>
> Kind regards,
> Sven
I would correct the typo in the patch for net-next.
Best Regards
Feng
Hello.
On 11/21/2016 3:39 AM, fgao@ikuai8.com wrote:
> From: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
>
> The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but
> it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan,
Packet.
> macvlan, and others treat NET_XMIT_CN as success too.
>
> So batman-adv should add the NET_XMIT_CN check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/net/batman-adv/routing.c b/net/batman-adv/routing.c
> index 7e8dc64..8edd324 100644
> --- a/net/batman-adv/routing.c
> +++ b/net/batman-adv/routing.c
> @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static int batadv_route_unicast_packet(struct sk_buff *skb,
> goto out;
>
> /* translate transmit result into receive result */
> - if (res == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) {
> + if (res == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS || ret == NET_XMIT_CN) {
Not 'res == NET_XMIT_CN'?
> /* skb was transmitted and consumed */
> batadv_inc_counter(bat_priv, BATADV_CNT_FORWARD);
> batadv_add_counter(bat_priv, BATADV_CNT_FORWARD_BYTES,
[...]
MBR, Sergei
Hi Sergei,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 11/21/2016 3:39 AM, fgao@ikuai8.com wrote:
>
>> From: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
>>
>> The tc could return NET_XMIT_CN as one congestion notification, but
>> it does not mean the packe is lost. Other modules like ipvlan,
>
>
> Packet.
Thanks, it was typo.
>
>> macvlan, and others treat NET_XMIT_CN as success too.
>>
>> So batman-adv should add the NET_XMIT_CN check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
>
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/net/batman-adv/routing.c b/net/batman-adv/routing.c
>> index 7e8dc64..8edd324 100644
>> --- a/net/batman-adv/routing.c
>> +++ b/net/batman-adv/routing.c
>> @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static int batadv_route_unicast_packet(struct sk_buff
>> *skb,
>> goto out;
>>
>> /* translate transmit result into receive result */
>> - if (res == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) {
>> + if (res == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS || ret == NET_XMIT_CN) {
Thanks again.
I didn't find it during myself's review and compile process.
>
>
> Not 'res == NET_XMIT_CN'?
>
>> /* skb was transmitted and consumed */
>> batadv_inc_counter(bat_priv, BATADV_CNT_FORWARD);
>> batadv_add_counter(bat_priv, BATADV_CNT_FORWARD_BYTES,
>
> [...]
>
> MBR, Sergei
>
I have sent the v2 patch which corrects these two typos.
Best Regards
Feng
@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ static bool batadv_dat_send_data(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv,
}
send_status = batadv_send_unicast_skb(tmp_skb, neigh_node);
- if (send_status == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) {
+ if (send_status == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS || send_status == NET_XMIT_CN) {
/* count the sent packet */
switch (packet_subtype) {
case BATADV_P_DAT_DHT_GET:
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ int batadv_frag_send_packet(struct sk_buff *skb,
batadv_add_counter(bat_priv, BATADV_CNT_FRAG_TX_BYTES,
skb_fragment->len + ETH_HLEN);
ret = batadv_send_unicast_skb(skb_fragment, neigh_node);
- if (ret != NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) {
+ if (ret != NET_XMIT_SUCCESS && ret != NET_XMIT_CN) {
/* return -1 so that the caller can free the original
* skb
*/
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static int batadv_route_unicast_packet(struct sk_buff *skb,
goto out;
/* translate transmit result into receive result */
- if (res == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS) {
+ if (res == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS || ret == NET_XMIT_CN) {
/* skb was transmitted and consumed */
batadv_inc_counter(bat_priv, BATADV_CNT_FORWARD);
batadv_add_counter(bat_priv, BATADV_CNT_FORWARD_BYTES,
@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ static int batadv_tp_send_msg(struct batadv_tp_vars *tp_vars, const u8 *src,
if (r == -1)
kfree_skb(skb);
- if (r == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS)
+ if (r == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS || r == NET_XMIT_CN)
return 0;
return BATADV_TP_REASON_CANT_SEND;