Missing list checks for *list_add*
Commit Message
Hi,
Simon debugged the refcnt problem and submitted some patches to fix them. I
had a brief look and noticed that there are possible more problems similar to
the *list_del* ones - just with *list_add*. Basically some functions use some
kind of get function, notice that the element does not exist and then create
a new one to add to the list. Only the "list_add" is protected. The result may
be that an element in twice in a list when only a single occurrence is allowed.
The problem I saw is batadv_gw_node_update. It first calls batadv_gw_node_get
to check if an object with this value already exists and then uses
batadv_gw_node_add to add a node (which may already be added between these
two calls). So it has to be made sure that nothing modifies the list between
these two calls).
Similar looking functions are for example:
* batadv_tvlv_handler_register
* batadv_nc_get_nc_node
* batadv_softif_create_vlan
* batadv_tt_global_orig_entry_add
Just for illustration what I meant with "nothing modifies the list between
these two calls":
Kind regards,
Sven
Comments
On Friday 26 June 2015 16:45:01 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Simon debugged the refcnt problem and submitted some patches to fix them. I
> had a brief look and noticed that there are possible more problems similar
> to the *list_del* ones - just with *list_add*. Basically some functions use
> some kind of get function, notice that the element does not exist and then
> create a new one to add to the list. Only the "list_add" is protected. The
> result may be that an element in twice in a list when only a single
> occurrence is allowed.
>
> The problem I saw is batadv_gw_node_update. It first calls
> batadv_gw_node_get to check if an object with this value already exists and
> then uses batadv_gw_node_add to add a node (which may already be added
> between these two calls). So it has to be made sure that nothing modifies
> the list between these two calls).
>
> Similar looking functions are for example:
>
> * batadv_tvlv_handler_register
> * batadv_nc_get_nc_node
> * batadv_softif_create_vlan
> * batadv_tt_global_orig_entry_add
*push*
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#include <linux/jiffies.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/lockdep.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/rculist.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
@@ -425,6 +426,8 @@ static void batadv_gw_node_add(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv,
{
struct batadv_gw_node *gw_node;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&bat_priv->gw.list_lock);
+
if (gateway->bandwidth_down == 0)
return;
@@ -441,9 +444,7 @@ static void batadv_gw_node_add(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv,
gw_node->orig_node = orig_node;
atomic_set(&gw_node->refcount, 1);
- spin_lock_bh(&bat_priv->gw.list_lock);
hlist_add_head_rcu(&gw_node->list, &bat_priv->gw.list);
- spin_unlock_bh(&bat_priv->gw.list_lock);
batadv_dbg(BATADV_DBG_BATMAN, bat_priv,
"Found new gateway %pM -> gw bandwidth: %u.%u/%u.%u MBit\n",
@@ -497,11 +498,14 @@ void batadv_gw_node_update(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv,
struct batadv_gw_node *gw_node, *gw_node_tmp, *curr_gw = NULL;
struct hlist_node *node_tmp;
+ spin_lock_bh(&bat_priv->gw.list_lock);
gw_node = batadv_gw_node_get(bat_priv, orig_node);
if (!gw_node) {
batadv_gw_node_add(bat_priv, orig_node, gateway);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&bat_priv->gw.list_lock);
goto out;
}
+ spin_unlock_bh(&bat_priv->gw.list_lock);
if ((gw_node->bandwidth_down == ntohl(gateway->bandwidth_down)) &&
(gw_node->bandwidth_up == ntohl(gateway->bandwidth_up)))